Suggest a Tool

Email us a link and we'll review it for inclusion.

Every listing on Neighbourhood Claw is hand-reviewed by an operator. We don't accept automated submissions yet — but we read every suggestion sent to:

mail hello@nbhdclaw.com

Include the URL, a one-line pitch, and (optionally) a category. We aim to respond within a week.

Neighbourhood Claw
Browse Tools Suggest a Tool
PinchBench Infrastructure tool screenshot — openclaw.ai

PinchBench

PinchBench is a public leaderboard benchmarking LLMs on standardized OpenClaw coding tasks, comparing success rate, speed, and cost across 50+ models.

Added
4 weeks ago

About

PinchBench is a public leaderboard benchmarking LLMs on standardized OpenClaw coding tasks, comparing success rate, speed, and cost across 50+ models. Built by Kilo Code, it runs live benchmarks updated continuously and exposes the data openly — down to individual task scores and run methodology. The leaderboard shows GPT-5.4 and Qwen 3.5 models currently leading, with Claude Sonnet 4.5/4.6 close behind.

person_check
Best For

AI engineers choosing LLMs for coding agents who want OpenClaw-specific benchmark data rather than general academic benchmarks — particularly useful for cost-performance trade-off decisions at scale.

Pros & Cons

check_circle

Pros

  • check Covers 50+ models with both best and average scores, giving a realistic picture rather than cherry-picked peaks
  • check Three-way trade-off view: success rate, speed, and cost in one place for budget-aware model selection
  • check Openly reproducible — all tasks and grading criteria are open source, and you can run the benchmark yourself
  • check Updated continuously (daily snapshots) so rankings reflect current model versions
  • check Includes both official and unofficial runs, with toggles for open-weight models only
cancel

Cons

  • close Focused exclusively on OpenClaw coding tasks — not a general AI benchmark; results don't transfer to other domains
  • close Powered by one company (Kilo Code), which has potential conflicts of interest if Kilo's own models appear in results
  • close Success rates vary significantly between best and average runs — a single best-score headline can be misleading
  • close Cost metrics depend on current API pricing, which changes frequently

More Infrastructure

Other tools in the same category.

View All arrow_forward