Suggest a Tool

Email us a link and we'll review it for inclusion.

Every listing on Neighbourhood Claw is hand-reviewed by an operator. We don't accept automated submissions yet — but we read every suggestion sent to:

mail hello@nbhdclaw.com

Include the URL, a one-line pitch, and (optionally) a category. We aim to respond within a week.

Neighbourhood Claw
Browse Tools Suggest a Tool
ClawDiary Monitoring tool screenshot — openclaw.ai

ClawDiary

ClawDiary combines three functions in one lightweight AI agent control layer: Audit (passive, non-blocking post-action logging), Guard (Telegram-based approval gate for high-risk actions), and Diary (

Added
3 weeks ago

About

ClawDiary combines three functions in one lightweight AI agent control layer: Audit (passive, non-blocking post-action logging), Guard (Telegram-based approval gate for high-risk actions), and Diary (a shared persistent store for multi-agent collaboration and cross-session memory). One-line integration via an API key; Guard and Audit can be configured independently. A daily digest cron delivers a Telegram summary of usage and blocked actions. Free tier includes 50 Guard checks and 200 Audit logs per day.

person_check
Best For

Solo developers and small teams who want lightweight audit logging + Telegram-based approval gating for high-risk agent actions, plus a simple shared memory store for multi-agent workflows — without the infrastructure overhead of larger governance platforms.

Pros & Cons

check_circle

Pros

  • check Three distinct functions in one integration — audit logging, risk gating, and shared agent memory in one API key
  • check Non-blocking audit mode means logging doesn't add latency to agent execution paths
  • check Telegram-based Guard approvals are practical for solo developers who already live in Telegram
  • check Shared Diary store enables genuine multi-agent collaboration with a synchronized persistent timeline
  • check Free tier is genuinely usable (50 Guard/day, 200 Audit/day, 10 Diary entries/day) for prototyping
cancel

Cons

  • close Telegram-only for Guard approvals — doesn't work well for teams not using Telegram
  • close Daily limits on free and Pro tiers can be restrictive for high-volume production agent workflows
  • close Audit is passive post-action — it doesn't prevent harmful actions, only records them
  • close No advanced policy authoring — Guard is binary (risky = pause, non-risky = pass) without fine-grained rule definition
  • close Small indie project with limited community and documentation depth

More Monitoring

Other tools in the same category.

View All arrow_forward